Davide Luca

 

d.luca@lse.ac.uk

        @d_t_luca

twitter-logo_318-40459

Does the territorial targeting of public goods change over time? Evidence from Turkey's public transport investment, with A. Rodríguez-Pose (London School of Economics). Under review.

 

Existing studies on the territorial allocation of public goods for electoral reasons primarily focus on how alternative electoral systems lead to different strategic allocative patterns. Yet, even with the same electoral rule, incumbents may decide to alter their targeting strategies according to changing political objectives. The current paper focuses on proportional representation (PR) systems, and asks whether the geographical patterns of strategic redistribution change when governments enjoy increasing electoral success. While in PR systems with strong parties governments have incentives to preferentially target core regions and punish foes’, we suggest that increases in incumbents’ popularity and hold on power may lead to a broadening in the territorial targeting of public goods. We employ a multi-method research strategy combining data on Turkey’s public transport investment for 2003-2013 with fieldwork involving in-depth interviews, and provide robust results in support of our hypothesis.

 

Achieving growth through the ballot box: political polarisation, votes, and local economic dynamics in Turkey.

 

There is significant literature on the adverse effects of political and social polarization on public policies and development outcomes. Yet, the research specifically exploring whether socio-political cleavages may affect subnational economic growth has been significantly scarcer. The current project proposal aims at filling this gap. It asks: in polities characterized by deep political polarization and where businesses are more reliant on state intervention – such as most countries in the Middle East and North Africa region –, do votes for the incumbent government ‘buy’ faster local economic growth, at the expenses of opposition constituencies? We test such question on the 81 provinces of Turkey over 2004-2014. New instrumental variable estimates suggest that voting for the incumbent Justice and Development Party (AKP) can lead to up to two percentage points of faster per-capita yearly GDP growth rate.

 

Stronger together? Assessing the causal impact of inter-municipal authorities on the efficiency of Italian local administrations, with F. Modrego (GSSI Institute for Advanced Studies).

 

Promoting better governance arrangements and coordination among local governments is seen as one of the solutions to overcome the challenge of providing key services to citizens under scarce resources across Europe. Yet, the empirical literature measuring the impacts of inter-municipal cooperation on local governments’ efficiency is scarce and provides contrasting evidence. In this paper we focus on Italy’s inter-municipal authorities (unioni di comuni). We exploit a fuzzy Regression Discontinuity Design to estimate their causal effect on the efficiency of member municipalities.

 

Deconsolidating democracy: the politics of Turkey's social spending under AKP rule, with M. Cammett (Harvard University), E. Sergenti (World Bank).

 

This paper explores patterns of central government spending on a range of social and economic sectors in Turkey from 2004 through 2014, when the ruling Islamic party, the Justice and Development Party (AKP), gained and consolidated its hold on power. We aim to contribute to research on distributive politics by assessing a variety of hypotheses about the nature of patronage politics in Turkey. We examine the degree to which the AK Party shifted its outreach strategy over time in response to electoral performance, cross-sectoral variation in patronage and developmental efforts, and geographic variation in social and economic expenditures in response to electoral performance.

 

Paving the way: highway construction and support for democratic deconsolidation in contemporary Turkey, with A. Filiztekin (Özyeğin University).